Dubai UAE News from the Press Property Market Disaster and More

  • Dubai 7 Stars
  • June 2021
    M T W T F S S
  • Middle East Unrest Update

  • Talk of the Town

    Jo Hopworth on Justice For Natalie – Na…
    Mariam on Criminal Complaint filed in Ge…
    Martin Kraeter on ACI Dubai Funds filed bankrupt…
    Independent Observer on Iranian’s lawsuit reveals roya…
    Rado on DubaiTouristen landen schnell…
    Dubai Citizen on Al Fajer Properties Case…
    Dane on Outlook in concrete- Dubai Wor…
    jamesl fayad on RERA Dubai – Dubai Prope…
    Jacques on Malika Karoum finally arrested…
    James Brown on ACI – Alternative Capita…
    Journalist on Al Fajer Properties-500 Invest…
    ron oakeley on ACI – Alternative Capita…
    Benson Fu on Shahram Zadeh against Al Fajer…
    Monika on RERA – Dubai mulls cance…
    Ali Varahram on Shahram Zadeh against Al Fajer…
  • Top Rated Comments

  • Top Posts

  • RSS Dubai United Arab Emirates Property Real Estate Debt Fraud Developer Investor Court News

    • Criminal Complaint filed against Al Fajer Properties Sheikh Maktoum
      Criminal Complaint filed in Germany against Sheikh Maktoum Hasher Maktoum Juma Al Maktoum CEO of Dubai Developer Al Fajer Properties The Dubai Sheikh who mislead and extort a German Couple  Germany – Dubai 2011 A German elderly couple , today 80 + 50 years old who have been Dubai Tourists since a decade, bought in 2005 an apartment at Nakheel´s Dubai Residen […]
    • UAE: Human Rights Blogger, Sorbonne Lecturer Charged With ‘Humiliating' Officials
      source Human Rights Watch www.hrw.org (Beirut) - The United Arab Emirates attorney general should immediately drop all charges against five pro-democracy activists to halt their trial, Human Rights Watch said today. The charges of "humiliating" top officials relate solely to the defendants' peaceful use of speech to criticize the UAE governmen […]
    • Nakheel Dubai Sunland Case
      June 5, 2011After 21 hearings, Chris O'Donnell, the Australian chief executive of Dubai's major developer, Nakheel, came to the defence of his former colleagues Matthew Joyce and Marcus Lee. Mr Joyce and Mr Lee are accused of profiting from the sale of land that had been earmarked for a colossal high-rise development, which was to include the futur […]
    • Dubai Nakheel CEO decided to leave the company
      Dubai June 7, 2011 Nakheel said on Wednesday that its CEO Chris O'Donnell had left the company "after completing his contract terms". O'Donnell, an Australian who joined the developer in 2006, said he had decided to leave Nakheel following five years spent with the company, the statement added. O'Donnell has overseen a traumatic time […]
    • Owner of Dubai Developer Damac Hussain Sajwani files case against Egypt corruption ruling
      Dubai property developer Damac said on Tuesday it had filed an international arbitration case against Egypt over a land dispute and the conviction of its chairman and owner, Hussain Sajwani.A Cairo court last week sentenced Sajwani in his absence to jail and ordered him to pay a $40.5 million fine in connection with his 2006 purchase of land at Egypt's […]
    • Dubai Palm Jumeriah - Investors plan to take legal action
      Investors in Dubai Palm Jumeirah’s Golden Mile complex will this week serve the developer behind the project with a legal ultimatum to hand over their units or issue them with a refund.Up to ten investors in the luxury complex plan to issue Souq Residences with legal notice in a bid to force a resolution to a dispute that has been ongoing for more than a yea […]
  • Top Rated Posts

    • 490,234 visitors 2010
  • Disclaimer 7 Stars Dubai

    This Website of the Blog 7starsdubai.wordpress.com and 7starsdubai.com content still existing media releases and comments from reputated press and websites only. The content of this Website focus to consumer protection for Investors of the Dubai Property market, the UAE and the Middle East. Press Article from the international Press who report about Fraud in relation with Property Investment and Real Estate Developer Investor Disputes in Dubai and the UAE as well reports from the Press about other criiminal acts and Civil Real Estate cases, Lawsuits before the Court in Dubai, the UAE or other countries. Furtheron we show reports about consumer protection and human rights in the Middle East. Actual Topics about the Unrest in Middle East. The information comprised in this section is not, nor is it held out to be, a solicitation of any person to take any form of investment decision. The content of this site does not constitute advice or a recommendation by us.Communications and should not be relied upon in making (or refraining from making) any decision relating to investments or any other matter. You should consult your own independent financial adviser and obtain professional advice before exercising any investment decisions or choices based on information featured in this Web site. We can not be held liable or responsible in any way for any opinions, suggestions, recommendations or comments made by any of the contributors to the various columns on this Web site nor do opinions of contributors necessarily reflect those of us.In no event shall we be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, direct, special, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages, or damages for lost profits, loss of revenue, or loss of use, arising out of or related to this Web site or the information contained in it, whether such damages arise in contract, negligence, tort, under statute, in equity, at law or otherwise. Comment Rules: Although the administrators and moderators of 7starsdubai.com will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off this Blog, it is impossible for us to review all comments . All messages express the views of the author, and neither the owners of this Blog, nor the administrator of this Blog will be held responsible for the content of any message, comment. By agreeing to these rules, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violative of any laws. The adminstrator of this Blog reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any comment (message) for any reason This Blog content still existing media releases and comments from websites only. The information comprised in this section is not, nor is it held out to be, a solicitation of any person to take any form of investment decision. The content of this site does not constitute advice or a recommendation by us.Communications and should not be relied upon in making (or refraining from making) any decision relating to investments or any other matter. You should consult your own independent financial adviser and obtain professional advice before exercising any investment decisions or choices based on information featured in this Blog. We can not be held liable or responsible in any way for any opinions, suggestions, recommendations or comments made by any of the contributors to the various columns on this Web site nor do opinions of contributors necessarily reflect those of us.In no event shall we be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, direct, special, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages, or damages for lost profits, loss of revenue, or loss of use, arising out of or related to this Web site or the information contained in it, whether such damages arise in contract, negligence, tort, under statute, in equity, at law or otherwise. Copyright: The copyright to the text of the blog is held by the author or link as source provided, where applicable. All images displayed are copyright their respective owners and are used either under licence or under the fair use provisions of international copyright law. The information contained in this Web site is for general guidance on matters of interest only. The application and impact of laws can vary widely based on the specific facts involved. Given the changing nature of laws, rules and regulations, and the inherent hazards of electronic communication, there may be delays, omissions or inaccuracies in information contained in this site. Accordingly, the information on this site is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal, accounting, tax, or other professional advice and services. As such, it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting, tax, legal or other competent advisers. Before making any decision or taking any action, you should consult the administrator of this website. While we have made every attempt to ensure that the information contained in this site has been obtained from reliable sources, 7starsdubai.com is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. All information in this site is provided "as is", with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including, but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event will 7starsdubai its related partnerships or corporations, or the partners, agents or employees thereof be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information in this site or for any consequential, special or similar damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Certain links in the Web site connect to other sites maintained by third parties that may or may not be presented within a frame on the Web site. 7starsdubai.com has not verified the contents of such third party sites and does not endorse, warrant, promote or recommend any services or products, that may be provided or accessed through them or any person or body which may provide them. 7starsdubai.com has not issued or caused to be issued any advertisements which may appear on these Web sites. We do not review, monitor or endorse any third party web sites linked to Our Site and We are not responsible for the content of any web site linked to Our Site. Your access to any web site that links to Our Site is at your sole risk. We are not responsible for the information, material, products, or services contained on or accessible through such other web sites and will not be liable for any form of loss or damage arising as a result of or in connection with your visits to such web sites. Any links to other web sites are provided merely for the convenience of the users of this Site and the inclusion of these links does not imply an endorsement of the linked web sites or the content therein. In addition, you agree not to link your web site or any other third party web site to Our Site or frame Our Site as part of any other web site without Our express prior written consent. We reserve the right, at any time and for any reason not prohibited by law, to deny permission to anyone to link a web site to, or frame, Our Site. We reserve the right to withdraw Our consent at any time to a link to, or framing of, Our Site at Our sole discretion without notice. Your use of this Site and the operation of these Terms and Conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws and regulations of and applicable in Germany You agree, acknowledge, and submit to the Court in Germany having non-exclusive jurisdiction over all and any dispute or difference between us arising out of or in connection with this Agreement. Please review these Terms and Conditions carefully before using this Site. Your use of this Site indicates your irrevocable agreement to be bound by these Terms and Conditions (as may be amended by Us from time to time). If you do not agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions please stop accessing and using this Site immediately. Warning: We are aware that several times Cybercriminals mirrowed our Website and posted on several Forums, Website comments by misuse of our email adresses. These Cybercriminals registerd several similar looking Domains and installed several 1:1 mirrowed Websites which look like our Website 7starsdubai. We have already taken the necessary steps by filing criminal complaints against the Individuals behind this Identity theft an Cybercrime, by misusing fraudulently our Blog Identity 7starsdubai. In Search engines like Google, Yahoo, Bling and others you should always take a close view to the links. If this links do not originaly start with www.7starsdubai.com or http://7starsdubai.worpress.com/.... you will end on a faked mirrowed modificated Website. The genral Background of this Cybercriminals is a Stalking and Smear campaign, faking stories for their personal use, to discriminate Persons with the goal to destroy their reputation.
  • RSS ZDF Heute Germany

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Posts Tagged ‘Dubai Property’

Property Investor won against Emaar before Dubai court

Posted by 7starsdubai on January 28, 2012

A Spanish Dubai property investor won a court order to seize the head offices of Emaar Properties, after its subsidiary failed to deliver an AED5.3m ($1.4m) villa on time, his lawyer has claimed.

The Dubai Court of Cassation issued an order on Nov 29 to allow representatives for Carlos Jose Periera to seize Emaar’s Dubai offices in an attempt to recoup AED3.4m, reflecting his villa payments to date and a sum of interest, said Fareya Azfar, partner at The Legal Group.

source Arabian Business continue reading…

Posted in Dubai Legal - Real Estate Lawsuits, Dubai Property Court, Emaar | Tagged: , , , , | Comments Off on Property Investor won against Emaar before Dubai court

Dubai Property Investors in Dispute – Standoff between buyers and developers

Posted by 7starsdubai on May 20, 2010

source The National original reported by Bradley Hope

Kasim Hammami says he was making a speculative investment when he put a 20 per cent down payment of Dh4.8 million (US$1.3m) on an entire floor of the planned Beachfront Living tower in Dubais Waterfront development in 2007.

It was pure buying and selling of properties, the Syrian businessman said of the strategy for the company he co-founded, New Wave Investments. We would trade three or four properties a year.

But, almost three years later, that investment is at the centre of a dispute between Mr Hammami and the developer, Omniyat Properties, which has sent him a cancellation notice after he defaulted on further payments.

In a property economy that, towards the end of the boom, was dominated by both speculative developers and buyers, many disputes similar to that involving Mr Hammami have ended up in the courts and the halls of the Land Department and Real Estate Regulatory Agency (RERA). Hundreds of cancellation notices have recently been sent out by developers and the Land Department to buyers who have default.

Everyone in Dubai is pointing the finger at whats called speculators, Mr Hammami said. We all share some responsibilities, including the regulator and the developer. What I would like is fair treatment.

Property laws in Dubai have created a standoff between buyers and developers. Developers are allowed to collect 30 per cent of the value of a property before connecting the remaining payments to construction milestones.

Mr Hammami would have to pay another 10 per cent of the Dh24m he has committed to pay for four apartments, or Dh2.4m, to meet his obligations.

Meanwhile, Omniyat has only recently started construction of the tower after hiring of a contractor to install piling. RERA classifies the project as not having reached the first of five construction milestones. A report on its website from February 23 said the enabling contractor has started mobilising on site and shoring works have started.

According to an official review of the projects escrow account by Caliber Middle East, a consultancy that advises RERA, earlier this year, Omniyat sold more than 200 apartments and collected Dh314.7m.

Of that money and other funds Omniyat invested in the project, Calibers review shows, the company spent Dh237m on land payments and Dh101.6m on marketing expenses. Just Dh738,866 was spent on construction. Omniyat declined to comment last week.

Nakheel, the developer behind the entire 130-square km Waterfront project, has stopped work on it and has not yet announced a plan for future building.

How can I invest more money when the project has barely started, Mr Hammami said.

The two sides have failed to reach an agreement during the past year.

A group of investors applied to RERA to cancel the project last year but did not receive a response, lawyers said. Then, earlier this year the Land Department acted as an intermediary with an offer to lower the price per square foot, but increase the size of the apartments by 20 per cent.

Mohammed Gamal, an investor who signed up to buy a floor of Beachfront Living for Dh35m in 2008, said: Investment entails by its sheer nature the possibility of loss. But, there are principles. It cannot be acceptable under any circumstances than when an external factor like the financial crisis comes that one party wins all and other party loses all.

See also: Questions raised over cancellations

Posted in Dubai, Dubai Property dispute, Dubai Property legal | Tagged: , , | Comments Off on Dubai Property Investors in Dispute – Standoff between buyers and developers

Dubai – Property Investors formed groups to take class actions against developer

Posted by 7starsdubai on May 19, 2010

source The National

Dubai – May 18, 2010

As hundreds of investors receive cancellation notices on defaulted properties across Dubai, the consolidation of the sector is approaching its endgame.

The move to cancel contracts and repossess properties is a last resort for developers whose profits have dwindled since the financial crisis took hold, experts say.

Property developers have come under increasing pressure to know what future income they can expect to generate from units that were sold at the peak of the market, many of which are now in default.

The final notices that are now being sent to investors who have missed payments in projects that are 80 per cent or more complete marks the end of a consolidation process which, for most developers, began about 18 months ago.

“I think the auditors have come in and started to put pressure on where the receivables are coming from,” said Ian Albert, the regional director of Colliers International. “At the end of the day, a developer wants to sell. It really is a last resort to go down this route.”

Nabil Ahmed, the regional head of research at Deutsche Bank, said that after more than a year of trying to limit defaults through consolidation, some developers are now clamping down on the “20 or 30 per cent of those they couldn’t help and who are defaulting simply because they don’t have the means to pay the remaining amount”.

Still, investors who have missed payments are standing their ground because they could lose the down payments they made on investments they hoped would generate lucrative returns. Some have formed groups to take class actions against developers trying to repossess properties.

The stalemate is a result of the huge speculation that took place in Dubai’s property sector in 2007 and 2008, when prices surged 78 per cent.

“It’s basically people who were caught when the market was effectively a trade market rather than an occupier’s one,” Mr Albert said.

It was also a time when banks were happy to pair up with developers to offer attractive home finance deals.

Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank (ADCB), for example, agreed with Al Fajer Properties in 2005 to offer 60 per cent financing to customers in Jumeirah Business Centre 5.

The deal involved buyers making payments over 10 years from the project’s completion, making it appealing to those who were unseasoned investors.

Both Al Fajer and ADCB recently confirmed that the credit line, which was worth about Dh500 million (US$136.1m), was cut towards the end of 2008 as the financial crisis took hold in the emirate’s property sector.

One British investor, who asked not to be named, bought two floors of office units in Jumeirah Business Centre 5 on the understanding that she would get a mortgage.At the height of the boom in 2008, she paid 40 per cent for one floor of office space and 50 per cent on the other at Dh1,100 a square foot. She is also among the dozens of investors in the project who recently received termination notices.
“I actually have a brochure that states we’d get preapproved finance,” she said. “We paid a big premium to get the comfort of having pre-approved finance … We weren’t told until recently that we wouldn’t get it. When the market and the world economy changed, we raised this issue and were told, ‘don’t worry about it, we’ll work something out’ … We proposed to do a merger of the two floors and pay additional funds but were told ‘no’.”

Meanwhile, Jumeirah Business Centre 5, which is almost ready for handover,
has a default rate of about 85 per cent.

A senior source within Al Fajer, who asked not to be named, said:
“We have customers who did get financing; the developers also thought they were going to get financing for their projects and didn’t. We barely got any financing – 80 per cent was done with cash.”

Other property developers have also started to send cancellation notices to investors including Al Mazaya and Omniyat Properties.

Mohammed Sultan Thani, the assistant director general of the Dubai Land Department, concedes there is no clear-cut solution to the deadlock. Hundreds of termination letters have been sent out by the department in recent months, he said, and an investor who wishes to dispute a termination notice needs to go to court.

Successful sales in the auction process will also put more pressure on Dubai’s already oversupplied property market, Mr Albert added. But the process may not be entirely smooth.

“What finance will be available for people to buy at auction? You’d be looking at a very small pool of cash buyers, and they will seek very attractive prices in order to put cash into non-completed properties.”

Posted in Al Fajer Properties, Dubai, Dubai Legal - Real Estate Lawsuits, Jumeirah Business Centre | Tagged: , | Comments Off on Dubai – Property Investors formed groups to take class actions against developer

Dubai Real Estate – What is a contract ?

Posted by 7starsdubai on September 28, 2008


Contracts are promises that the law will enforce.

Recently, the Dubai property market has witnessed an increasing spate of developers falling behind schedule on their construction milestones. In addition, some developers have even tried to abort entire property developments after off-plan sales, seeking instead to buy back unfinished properties from their investors. In this special report, PROPERTYworks investigates to find out more…

While local property investors get edgy about construction delays and compromises on quality, lawyers are experiencing a renaissance as disgruntled customers engage the legal system here to get back at certain developers.

But a court case is by no means a quick fix. It would be expensive and very difficult to rely on the courts when a developer gets behind schedule. Instead, making oneself aware of the basic elements of a contract and speaking up for one’s rights are the most effective ways to ensure that property developers deliver exactly what they promise and on time.
Currently, most real estate investors in Dubai purchase their properties ‘off-plan’, which means they wait for the construction to commence and for their homes to be completed. In all fairness, almost every property developer in the UAE, big or small, is very keen to promote the UAE as a good place to buy and a great place to live.

Most developers enter into their contracts with investors in good faith and with the full intention of meeting their deadlines. In fact, they themselves probably enter into similar back-to-back contracts with contractors for matching deadlines.
There are, however, a host of factors outside of the control of the developers, especially now, when there is so much strain on construction resources.

Rising construction costs in the UAE are putting extreme pressure on most property developers. The cost of construction has risen significantly in the past few years, with steel prices rising by 38 per cent in 2007 and cement prices by 30 per cent in the same period, according to figures from the construction consultancy EC Harris.

An EFG Hermes report said construction cost inflation is being driven higher by rising costs of building materials, as well as the rising cost of labour. A serious shortage of labour and raw materials and strong demand, as well as the mandatory adoption of green building codes and health and life insurance, are likely to increase construction costs in the UAE even further this year. A tonne of steel reinforcement bar (rebar) now costs about US$1,150 (AED4,223), up from US$980 in March. The wholesale price of cement was this month capped by the ministry of economy at AED340 per tonne, up from AED295.

Price increases have meant that building firms risk huge financial losses, or even bankruptcy, if they sign deals that do not make provisions for price escalation. In some cases, the pressures have resulted in concern that the quality of construction is being compromised.
News of the cancellation of Damac Properties’ Palm Springs development was the first to break into the media. Homes in the project were sold more than five years ago, but construction until today has yet to start.

Opprobrium for Damac’s announcement came from as far away as London, where investors threatened to sue the developer unless the properties they had paid for were built.

Palm Springs should have been completed by the end of last year, but Damac postponed construction of the homes and finally cancelled it completely in March. Damac offered to buy back the ownership rights to the properties at a premium of six per cent per annum for every year since investors bought it. An investment of US$1 million when the project was launched five years ago previously would only be bought back for US$1.33 million – hardly the return that the rest of the Dubai property boom was delivering over the same period.

Damac claimed the cancellation was due to planning changes imposed on it by Nakheel, the master developer of Palm Jebel Ali, on which Palm Springs was due to reside. Nakheel denied any responsibility. Following discussions between Nakheel, Damac and the industry watchdog, the Dubai Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), Damac agreed to complete the project. Officials of the RERA said the major concern was to protect the interests of investors and the reputation of the real estate sector in Dubai.

The Damac case was a rather high profile project and a high profile development. Obviously, from the time of entering into contracts with initial buyers to the stage at which the development should have been delivered, prices in the market have increased significantly as well.

If investors had gone ahead with a court case to recover just their initial stake, not only would they have lost any further potential capital that they had invested and any interest on any loans that they had taken out, but also the capital growth in the market that they could have invested elsewhere.

According to Jane Dalton, a property lawyer with the law firm Trowers & Hamlins in Abu Dhabi: “At the moment, there is very little scope for individual investors to negotiate termination and compensation provisions with developers. It really is a take-it-or-leave-it attitude. And I think going forward, it would be helpful if developers were more open to negotiation of those original sales terms at an earlier stage.”

“Usually a purchase contract has certain provisions specified for delays, and usually depending on the reason for that delay, whether it is directly attributable to the developer, or a matter that is outside of their control, those provisions will dictate at which stage a buyer can actually withdraw from the contract and what is payable in terms of compensation,” she continued. “There do tend to be periods built into the contracts by which both parties accept that the developer may overrun for specific reasons.”

Of course, the consequence of withdrawing from a contract is that the only thing that is reimbursable to the buyer is his initial stake in the property. By the time or termination of the contract due to delays, the property value might have gone up many times. And obviously, if one has bought in the secondary or tertiary market, then one would only be entitled to the price put down by the original buyer.

“And so there could be quite a disparity between what you could actually reclaim by withdrawing from the contract and what one could potentially recoup by waiting and hanging on for the delays to finish,” added Dalton.

During the construction phase, a property investor has no ownership right to his property, and so his only security is found in the sale and purchase agreement that he signed with the property developer. Quite simply, the only option one has in case the developer gets behind schedule or doesn’t live up to promises before the construction has been completed and the property handed over, is to sue the developer in a UAE court – an option that could take years for a final decision.

“It very much boils down to the contract between the purchaser and the developer,” said Mohammed Kamal, associate at Al Tamimi & Company Advocates and Legal Consultants. “Now, usually the contracts allow flexibility to the developer. A developer will usually indicate at least a target date for estimated delivery and then allow room for going beyond that – typically, it can be up to 13 months.

That is quite acceptable in the market right now, both in Dubai and Abu Dhabi.”
“There really isn’t anything else in the laws and regulations, and I think it would really rest on the terms of the contract, and if there was a clear breach of the contract on the part of the developer, then the purchaser would be entitled to take action in the courts or any other alternative form of dispute resolution, if stipulated in the contract,” he added.

Particular attention should be paid by investors to clauses in the contract dealing with any delivery dates and under what circumstances these dates may be pushed back by the developer.
Contracts are promises that the law will enforce. The law provides remedies if such a promise is violated, and recognises the performance of that promise as a duty. Contracts arise when a duty does or may come into existence, because of a promise made by one of the parties.
In order to be a legally binding contract, a promise must be exchanged for adequate ‘consideration’. Adequate consideration is a benefit or detriment a party receives, which reasonably and fairly induces them to make the promise.

An example of this would be purchasing an off-plan apartment from a property developer. The developer and the buyer come together to discuss the terms of the exchange (in all likelihood, the purchase is outlined in a written agreement). Thus, they have fulfilled the first requirement of consideration. To meet the second requirement, there must be a mutual exchange. In this case, the property developer (if one of the main developers in Dubai) provides ownership if the apartment is in a freehold area of Dubai, while the buyer provides payment. Third, the bargain terms must be of value. The apartment is worth what the buyer hands over. Therefore, this contract has met its consideration requirement, because it fits all elements of consideration.

he UAE is essentially a Civil Law jurisdiction heavily influenced by French, Egyptian, Roman and Islamic law. The increasing presence of international commercial contracts has resulted in the application of English common law practices, further influencing the UAE legal system.

The law relating to contracts in common law specifies that the agreement must consist of an offer and acceptance, and also consideration for a contract to exist. It is important that buyers learn to recognise these elements in contracts they plan to sign.


An offer is an indication by one person to another of their willingness to contract on certain terms without further negotiations.

A contract is then formed if there is express or implied agreement. A contract is said to come into existence when acceptance of an offer has been communicated to the one making the offer.

Another important element to understand is misrepresentation. Misrepresentation is a false statement of fact made by one party to another party and has the effect of inducing that party into the contract.

For example, under certain circumstances, false statements or promises made by a seller of goods regarding the quality or nature of the product that the seller has may constitute misrepresentation.

In the UK, a finding of misrepresentation by a court of law allows for a remedy of rescission (termination of the contract), and sometimes damages depending on the type of misrepresentation found to have taken place. However, common law principles are not explicitly recognised under UAE law.
Despite the differences between legal systems, lawyers like Carol Alderson in Dubai, who has been practicing in the UK and the UAE for the last 25 years, vows to bring about more robust protection for property investors.

The way sales agreements are drafted in Dubai is very one-sided in favour of developers, and unless customers are aware of their legal rights, they will not know how to protect themselves from becoming unfairly disadvantaged,” said Alderson, who is a senior partner at Samial Al Midfa Advocacy and Legal Consultants in Dubai.

“If we get a precedent ruling in a Dubai court against a developer for construction delays, then it will deter future developers from making promises that they cannot keep and will change the way sales and purchase agreements are drafted here,” she explained.

Adopting previous court judgment is another principle of a common law practice that is not recognised in the UAE. However, such precedents may in Dubai be presented to the court for persuasion purposes.

“Precedents do deter people,” Alderson pointed out.

Dalton further added:

“Within the region, the terms and conditions of contracts that I’ve seen are fairly standard, and I don’t think you could distinguish between one project and one developer from another. It is just the state of the market here, and it is very much a developing market.”
Most lawyers are in agreement that developers are not being brought to task for their demands that customers sign contracts “as is”, regardless of whether the developers are actually able and willing to perform the obligations specified therein.

Developers are obviously going to want to protect their interests as best they can, and it is supply and demand that determines whether a developer will be able to adopt a “take it or leave it” approach with regard to the contracts they produce. The level of demand for property in the past has put developers in a strong position with regard to the contracts they produce, and if a particular buyer wasn’t prepared to accept the developer’s standard form of contract, then there were usually ten others that would have.

It remains to be seen whether there will be a slowdown in the UAE market that may result in buyers being placed in a stronger bargaining position than previously.

Some developers have given buyers the option of a full refund if there are delays beyond the 12 months, while others provide no recourse and buyers just have to sit and wait for them to complete the work.

“Penalties have been paid as well as interest to disgruntled purchasers by certain developers, but it is certainly not the norm. The developers have considerable flexibility,” said Kamal.
Consumer protection in DubaiIn Dubai, new consumer protection laws will protect the purchaser in the case of non-delivery or late delivery. There is also the regulatory watchdog, the RERA. So, a developer is now subject to further controls in terms of its construction progress and ultimate delivery to the buyer.

Specifically, the Trust (Escrow) Account Law has established the setting up of escrow accounts for property development to protect purchasers of off-plan properties by ensuring that the payments made to a developer in advance of handover of a completed unit are protected in a separate ‘escrow’ account until certain construction milestones are met.
The law is applicable to all property developers in Dubai, and they are required to set up trust accounts to deposit all monies received from customers for off-plan property sales.

The funds collected from buyers are to be held in escrow accounts that will be offered at banks that are licensed to offer such facilities by the Dubai RERA.

Funds will only be released to the developer (for the purpose of funding the project) once certain stages of construction are completed. An independent surveyor will assess the stages of completion of construction.
In addition, the Dubai Land Department will hold 10 per cent of the value of the development in the escrow account for one year after handover to act as a warranty for any defects in the construction or finishing of the property.

“I think the risk of non-delivery is somewhat less now for developments in Dubai. Developers are doing the proper budget allocations required so that they can make good on their promises. We don’t just have the contract now, but there are regulatory measures to protect the purchaser in Dubai,” said Kamal.

“The Trust Account Law applies retrospectively. In some cases, if a project is fairly advanced and is close to delivery, we have seen cases of the Escrow Law requirements being waived.”
He added: “I would say that anything that is 70 per cent or above completed is likely to be exempted from the Trust Account Law, subject to approval by the RERA, because the risk of non-delivery is less.”

Another thing off-plan property investors in Dubai should be on guard for is shoddy workmanship.

All sales agreements should specify a written schedule about the finishing and fittings included in the property. Brand names should be mentioned if applicable to the quality promised. If this is not done, a buyer should be prepared to accept whatever he gets, and will have no recourse to get this rectified later.

One cannot anticipate structural defects that may crop up, but in Dubai, buyers have the Joint Ownership of Property Law (the Strata Law), which assures that all property developers will remain liable for 10 years from the date of completion of a building to repair and rectify any defects in the structural elements of a property. This includes the main supports, roofs, foundations, walls, ceilings hallways, stairwells, etc.

n addition, according to the Dubai Strata Law, all developers also remain liable for one year from the date of completion to repair or replace defective installations in the common property, including mechanical and electrical works, sanitary and plumbing installations, etc. Thereafter, these liabilities devolve to the owners.

There have been a number of complaints about the quality going into the finishing of certain property developments in Dubai. Once again, the advice to buyers is to purchase a property from a developer that has already built properties that are completed, so they can have a look at them inside and out to assess the quality of the finish.

Is it a crime?

But do unfulfilled promises or delays in construction by developers add up to the crime of misrepresentation or fraud, as some lawyers allege they do?

Alderson said: “If written communication is made about what you intend to receive from the developer, and if you don’t receive that, then those written confirmations are misrepresentations by the developer.

If the first stage of construction (the ground breaking) has not even started by the end of the date stipulated in the sales contract, then it is a clear case of breach of contract, and it means the developer is guilty of fraud and had no intention of honoring the performance of its obligations.”

Kamal agrees: “It could be considered misrepresentation, yes. If a date for delivery has been stated somewhere in the marketing literature, the contract or some kind of assurance has been made to the purchaser that they would deliver the property by a certain date, and the purchaser could prove that it would not be realistically possible, then I think that a purchaser would be entitled to make such a claim.”

In order for the concept of misrepresentation in the UAE Civil Code to apply in a case, it would require that the party claiming misrepresentation shows that there was an element of “trickery” on the part of the party accused of misrepresentation.

The Dubai courts tend to require a direct link to be shown between any breach of contract and damages suffered, meaning that an investor, at best, is only likely to get his or her money back in the event of a successful court action (and possibly a minimal costs and interest award). Indirect, consequential or penal damages are very difficult to obtain.

Shahram Safai, partner at Afridi & Angell Legal Consultants, said it is theoretically possible to frame an action based on misrepresentation. However, it is much more difficult to prove in court.

“It should be noted that courts will want to see proof that the developer deceived the buyer by means of trickery to induce the buyer to sign the sale and purchase agreement, for example by stating that the completion date would be much earlier even though the developer knew that this was not the case. It may be difficult for buyers to assemble and to provide such proof to the court as evidence,” he explained.

“In my opinion, an action can be successfully maintained by a buyer on the basis of [what is in the written contract], assuming all material facts support his or her claim. In such an event, a court should order a refund of the payments made by the buyer, as well as interest and any penalties,” added Safai.

As stated before, most sale and purchase agreements in the UAE cover the consequences of delay of completion. These consequences are generally: (1) Interest or a penalty is paid and (2) If delay extends beyond a predetermined date, the buyer can terminate the agreement and receive back his payments along with applicable interest or penalties.

Property investors should make sure that such remedies are included in all contracts they sign to purchase off-plan, and that the terms are clear and explicit.
Kamal said: “Very few cases of this nature go to court. We have seen various investors raising the issue of delays, negotiating and settling with the developer by way of compensation or some other concession to account for the delays in delivery. But I have not seen cases going to court, because it is just not seen as worthwhile from the investor’s standpoint to pay the money to run a court case.”
If penalty clauses for construction delays were made compulsory as a mandatory part of all off-plan sales agreements, this may deter developers and act as a further incentive to ensure that properties are delivered on time.

The most important message that should get across to property investors is simply that they should read their contracts very carefully and ask questions about any provisions that they are unsure about.

Investors should not be afraid to ask for changes or clarifications to be made to the contract before they sign, and a developer’s response to any such reasonable request may give an indication of the respectability of the developer.


Posted in Dubai Real Estate | Tagged: , | Comments Off on Dubai Real Estate – What is a contract ?

%d bloggers like this: